Re:Unplanned Exposure During Diving in the Spent Nuclear Fue...
by mmooss on Sunday September 29, 2024 @01:36AM
(#41685180)
But not cost-effectively, afaik ?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Unplanned Exposure During Diving in the Spent Nuclear Fue...
by rnhmjoj on Sunday September 29, 2024 @05:27AM
(#41686045)
It depends what you consider as costs. France power generation (and consumption as well) is one of the very few with reliably low carbon intensity. You can play around with https://app.electricitymaps.com/map and see how bad the emissions are in the rest of Europe.
Re:Unplanned Exposure During Diving in the Spent Nuclear Fue...
by mmooss on Sunday September 29, 2024 @11:42PM
(#41693328)
So not cost-effectively in the universally understood meaning.
I think carbon should be taxed and the externality should be moved to balance sheets, but that's another discussion.
France didn't solve the problem of cost-effective nuclear power.