Re:Why Ruby is an acceptable Lisp (2005)
by gruseom on Thursday January 01, 2009 @06:54PM
(#416799)
Don't read articles about Ruby!
I usually don't! This is an article about Ruby and "LISP". I read articles about Lisp. This one is mistaken, I think, mostly because the author hasn't used Lisp to do much, but writes about it anyway.
But I really don't mean to carp about the article. Ruby makes him happy, that's great.
Re:Why Ruby is an acceptable Lisp (2005)
by ii on Thursday January 01, 2009 @07:29PM
(#416825)
I see your point. But, please, let's encourage people to write more articles about what they think is right. Even if the article is wrong it's still good that it was written.
I usually don't! This is an article about Ruby and "LISP". I read articles about Lisp. This one is mistaken, I think, mostly because the author hasn't used Lisp to do much, but writes about it anyway.
But I really don't mean to carp about the article. Ruby makes him happy, that's great.