Re:Unplanned Exposure During Diving in the Spent Nuclear Fue...
by carlmr on Saturday September 28, 2024 @02:34AM
(#41678342)
The more important consideration is we're wasting the waste. It still contains 90% of the fissile energy and we're calling it waste: https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/5-fast-facts-about-spent-....
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Unplanned Exposure During Diving in the Spent Nuclear Fue...
by laurencerowe on Saturday September 28, 2024 @02:47AM
(#41678390)
The problem with nuclear reprocessing is that it creates more nuclear waste as a byproduct so it only really makes sense when you want to make nuclear weapons.
Re:Unplanned Exposure During Diving in the Spent Nuclear Fue...
by pfdietz on Saturday September 28, 2024 @07:01AM
(#41679421)
That figure is correct only if you consider the energy content of the U-238 in the fuel. But reprocessing fuel to recover U-238 is idiotic: we have loads of U-238 in enrichment plant waste streams, and the material is so cheap they use it as ballast weights in sailboats.