News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Unplanned Exposure During Diving in the Spent Nuclear Fue... by elcritch on Saturday September 28, 2024 @02:33AM (#41678340)
Because batteries are expensive but needed for overnight storage or cloudy conditions. There’s also the amount of land and materials needed to produce solar devices.

It’s ultimately more about unit cost of power than total available power.

Re:Unplanned Exposure During Diving in the Spent Nuclear Fue... by hmcq6 on Saturday September 28, 2024 @02:53AM (#41678419)
Can we not build solar panels in the ocean like we do with wind turbines?

"Because batteries are expensive"

Are they? It would only take 4000 copies of the Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility to store all the electricity we currently use in a day.

Some back of the napkin math says it would cost $2 Trillion, which is only double the amout we subsidized the fuel industry last year

Re:Unplanned Exposure During Diving in the Spent Nuclear Fue... by ben_w on Sunday September 29, 2024 @06:06AM (#41686250)
> Can we not build solar panels in the ocean like we do with wind turbines?

Technically yes, but that's a bad idea: ocean environment is very unforgiving, and has more clouds than land has. It also has more (and more reliable) wind and fewer people complaining about the very large turbines, which is why it works for wind.

> Some back of the napkin math says it would cost $2 Trillion, which is only double the amout we subsidized the fuel industry last year

Napkin maths also says that a global power grid would be 10% of that price. By coincidence, it takes a cross section of almost exactly 1m^2 to make a 40,000 km long line have a resistance of 1 Ω.

Further investigation said that literally only China has that much spare capacity for aluminium production, but still.

That kind of scale of battery production is still needed for the cars, though.