News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fraud, so much fraud by lanstin on Friday September 27, 2024 @09:38PM (#41677196)
Barry Apppelman, for a long time the boss of all the Unix engineers, said malice was preferable to incompetence because malice would take breaks.
Re:Fraud, so much fraud by vasvir on Saturday September 28, 2024 @01:03AM (#41678018)
Yes and in addition malice is enough times predictable while incompetence is just a quantum void where the probabilities are inverted and your hard earned intuition doesn't help you...
Re:Fraud, so much fraud by rdtsc on Saturday September 28, 2024 @01:09AM (#41678042)
However malice is directed. When it doesn’t take breaks it does a lot more damage usually.

One can argue malice can be controlled with incentives at some level, though.

Re:Fraud, so much fraud by bmsan on Saturday September 28, 2024 @07:17PM (#41683595)
So can "stupidity". If something is possible for a human to do, it's something that's possible for any sufficiently-enabled/supported human to do. I've heard it put that the inability to understand or do something is a matter of not having acquired the necessary prerequisites. So, the incentives to control stupidity are the incentives to acquire and apply the prerequisite skills or knowledge.
Re:Fraud, so much fraud by specproc on Saturday September 28, 2024 @04:27AM (#41678793)
Hmm, sure, but if you want to spot malice, look for the one not taking breaks.
Re:Fraud, so much fraud by lanstin on Monday September 30, 2024 @07:14PM (#41703096)
I don't seem to be able to edit this anymore, but there is a grievous gap in the writing: "Barry Appelman, for a long time the boss of all the Unix engineers at AOL."