News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CNN and USA Today Have Fake Websites, I Believe Forbes Ma... by wbl on Friday September 27, 2024 @03:38PM (#41674721)
Every syndicated story had a byline indicating syndication.
Re:CNN and USA Today Have Fake Websites, I Believe Forbes Ma... by hedora on Friday September 27, 2024 @04:05PM (#41675010)
Yeah; and they were generally extremely high quality.
Re:CNN and USA Today Have Fake Websites, I Believe Forbes Ma... by mike50 on Friday September 27, 2024 @09:09PM (#41677066)
40 years ago maybe. Now it's written to a 5th grade level and bloated with explain like I'm five filler.
Re:CNN and USA Today Have Fake Websites, I Believe Forbes Ma... by kube-system on Friday September 27, 2024 @04:46PM (#41675368)
Major US newspapers in the 21st century did. But regardless, many of them were opaque in nature. "Via AP" may check the box of attribution but is lost on a reader of average literacy.
Re:CNN and USA Today Have Fake Websites, I Believe Forbes Ma... by xbar on Friday September 27, 2024 @05:46PM (#41675871)
Newswires were well understood entities for all newspaper readers for more than 100 years.
Re:CNN and USA Today Have Fake Websites, I Believe Forbes Ma... by sokoloff on Saturday September 28, 2024 @08:47AM (#41679911)
That’s giving an awful lot of credit to “all newspaper readers” there.

Certainly as a kid/teen, I didn’t understand it; I suspect plenty of adults didn’t either.

Re:CNN and USA Today Have Fake Websites, I Believe Forbes Ma... by x0x0 on Friday September 27, 2024 @09:34PM (#41677183)
This was not used to commingle authority vs the stories they reported themselves, and is in no way comparable to what cnn is doing, ie leveraging their site rank to juice traffic to trash content for ad dollars.