> No you're mixing things. I said acts of privacy (with listed examples of reporting large transactions) are made illegal, then you went to only money laundering.

How did I move to money laundering? Are we reading the same thread? The comment I initially replied to specifically said, "Why is any attempt at financial privacy deemed money laundering"?

> you were being duplicitous. Your premise is a lie designed to mislead the audience.

It's quite the opposite, but your personal swipes are pretty uncalled for, so I won't continue.