Re:Winamp removed "No forking" restriction from license
by throwaway2046 on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @05:56PM
(#41652289)
Audacious supports classic Winamp skins so if you're only after the aesthetics just use that. Alternatively you may be able to run the original Winamp through Wine.
Re:Winamp removed "No forking" restriction from license
by camel-cdr on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @05:36PM
(#41652133)
I wonder, would publishing a diff be against the license?
Re:Winamp removed "No forking" restriction from license
by bravetraveler on Thursday September 26, 2024 @04:44AM
(#41656019)
I don't believe so, they can't control what you create or what others may do with it for personal use. They may only control winamp/their interests
The assumptions being, users of the patch get their own source and this isn't for commercial purposes. This is The Old Way
I think this is how we got MP3 support at large before the patents expired or something. Memory is failing me.
Re:Winamp removed "No forking" restriction from license
by johnisgood on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @05:21PM
(#41652008)
XMMS2!
Re:Winamp removed "No forking" restriction from license
by thedoctor_o on Thursday September 26, 2024 @11:25AM
(#41659473)
I used to do plug-ins because it scratched an itch to code & provide things that'd be of use to others which when you've got a job to pay for that free time then it's less of an issue. Also the time of winamp & the plug-in / skin community of the time were somewhat reflective of how interested people were in tech vs how commoditised it's now become & generically boring imho. And I'm probably guilty of the change in behaviours with how I'm trying to fund wacup but 2 decades on is a long time & most of those early creatives have bills to pay.
It is all spyware or FOSS nowadays ...
I would have liked a Winamp port to Linux for nostalgias sake. But, dunno why anyone would bother with it now when you'd need to be sneaky about it or don't share it openly.