News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TechCrunch on Facebook Source Code Leak by staunch on Sunday August 12, 2007 @04:28AM (#41644)
I think his point was that it's not really very much of the functional code. It's basically the little piece that pulls in whatever's appropriate for each page. The libraries might have 50k LOC while the individual pages are a few dozen lines.
Re:TechCrunch on Facebook Source Code Leak by palish on Sunday August 12, 2007 @02:31PM (#41686)
I was commenting about certain people saying that Facebook code is ugly and procedural and that they should have implemented object oriented naming conventions, or whatever else silliness they think needs to be done. Not trying to be mean to my friend nickb over there :)
Re:TechCrunch on Facebook Source Code Leak by ed on Sunday August 12, 2007 @02:36PM (#41687)
I think I'm one of those people. So, why shouldn't they?
Re:TechCrunch on Facebook Source Code Leak by palish on Sunday August 12, 2007 @02:39PM (#41688)
Mm.. Let's just agree to disagree. Going down this comment path would just incite something pointless.
Re:TechCrunch on Facebook Source Code Leak by ed on Sunday August 12, 2007 @02:54PM (#41691)
Heh, point taken :)