News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. Parent comment

Re:Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by robwwilliams on Tuesday September 24, 2024 @11:20PM (#41643387)
All too easy to understand your situation. NIH is finally but slowly waking up and is imposing more “onerous” (aka: essential and correct) data management and sharing (DMS) document. Every grant applicant now submits following these guidelines:

https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-24-1...

Unfortunately, not all NIH institutes understand how to evaluate and moderate this key new policy. Oddly enough the peer reviewers do NOT have access to DMS plans as of this year.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by IG_Semmelweiss on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @04:18AM (#41645033)
Is this a process whereby the researcher is forced to submit the thesis (null, etc) of the research, ahead of the study and its findings?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by robwwilliams on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @02:22PM (#41650345)
I think you are referring to clinical trial registration. Different idea and process (a QA-like step).

The NIH DMS mandates are about the data generated by an award.

[ Parent | on HN ]