Re:Matt Mullenweg needs to step down from WordPress.org lead...
by rpgbr on Monday September 23, 2024 @01:29PM
(#41628463)
It could be if the leader didn't gained anything by pointing out a bad behavior in the ecosystem, which isn't the case for Matt. He runs a direct competitor to WP Engine.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Matt Mullenweg needs to step down from WordPress.org lead...
by yunohn on Monday September 23, 2024 @02:04PM
(#41628820)
I think it’s fair for the creator of the product (WP) to criticize competition that undermines a feature he considers important to him. He also makes a very important point about WPEngine not contributing back to the AGPLv2 codebase you are talking about.
Re:Matt Mullenweg needs to step down from WordPress.org lead...
by FireBeyond on Monday September 23, 2024 @02:42PM
(#41629240)
> I think it’s fair for the creator of the product (WP) to criticize competition that undermines a feature he considers important to him
That his own product ALSO gates access to, unless you pay the top tier for?
I don't think it's fair to criticize the competition for that, and not acknowledge that you do the same, no.
Re:Matt Mullenweg needs to step down from WordPress.org lead...
by yunohn on Monday September 23, 2024 @03:06PM
(#41629454)
How is it gated on Wordpress.com? Here are the docs:
Re:Matt Mullenweg needs to step down from WordPress.org lead...
by FireBeyond on Monday September 23, 2024 @10:48PM
(#41632675)
That's the open source project. WordPress.com, Matt's for-profit venture, gates revisions (and statistics, and plugins) behind a higher paying tier.