Re:MySQL is bazillion times faster than MemSQL
by mikeash on Tuesday June 26, 2012 @12:38PM
(#4162795)
How is it heavy handed? As I understand the article, MemSQL by default will often say that a transaction has been committed even though it only exists in memory, not on disk. Comparing that scenario with a MySQL setup which only says a transaction has been committed once it's on non-volatile storage is just wrong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.