Re:How the iPhone 16's electrically-released adhesive works
by Wingman4l7 on Monday September 23, 2024 @10:10AM
(#41626321)
Given that Apple moved the goalposts in the first place (they literally invented an inferior screw head -- the Pentalobe -- to stymie repair), I'm steadfastly disinclined to give them much credit for slowly backtracking on anti-repair manufacturing techniques like battery adhesive that they themselves pioneered the use of first, in laptops no less.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How the iPhone 16's electrically-released adhesive works
by labcomputer on Monday September 23, 2024 @10:38AM
(#41626644)
Really, Apple invented it? Did they also invent a time machine to go back 5 years before it was first used on an Apple device to deliver a batch pentalobes to Sony in 2003?
Re:How the iPhone 16's electrically-released adhesive works
by Wingman4l7 on Monday September 23, 2024 @11:46AM
(#41627346)
Might want to not rely on Wikipedia for your nitpicking rebuttal to my point -- the Sony "Pentalobe" was NOT the same as Apple's, it is 5-flanged but has clearly cut-off tips: https://preview.redd.it/mdo85jqd6rcb1.jpg?width=3024&format=... -- and regardless, Apple's wide-scale use of these screw-heads was transparently anti-repair.
Re:How the iPhone 16's electrically-released adhesive works
by wannacboatmovie on Monday September 23, 2024 @11:06AM
(#41626959)
Did they also use that time machine to go back and invent replaceable batteries in mobile phones?
Re:How the iPhone 16's electrically-released adhesive works
by sbuk on Tuesday September 24, 2024 @12:15PM
(#41638136)
Ackshually, the pentalobe screwdrivers, commonly available now, are superior to Phillips as they are more resistant to cam-outs and tamper proof.
Re:How the iPhone 16's electrically-released adhesive works
by Wingman4l7 on Tuesday September 24, 2024 @01:05PM
(#41638613)
Who said I was comparing it to Phillips? Sure, Apple used to use Phillips for their case-back screws on their laptops, but Torx (superior to Pentalobe) already existed, and may have already been used by Apple elsewhere (I don't readily recall).
Tamper-proof? Hardly.