Re:Three Mile Island nuclear plant restart in Microsoft AI p...
by BobaFloutist on Friday September 20, 2024 @01:23PM
(#41603964)
Somehow you never hear these people say "What if the nuclear fuel supply chain becomes compromised for an arbitrarily extended period."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Three Mile Island nuclear plant restart in Microsoft AI p...
by Filligree on Friday September 20, 2024 @01:26PM
(#41603996)
Because it’s reasonably cheap to buy two decades of fuel in advance, and it won’t take up much space. If such a thing were a concern, then people would do precisely that.
If it were still a problem towards the end of that period, then you can in fact extract uranium from seawater.
Re:Three Mile Island nuclear plant restart in Microsoft AI p...
by cykros on Saturday September 21, 2024 @01:06AM
(#41607628)
This is true even before you start talking about reprocessing spent fuel with breeder reactors.
Re:Three Mile Island nuclear plant restart in Microsoft AI p...
by akvadrako on Saturday September 21, 2024 @04:20AM
(#41608444)
It's also plentiful in many countries, it's just not mined because it's too cheap. But since fuel is under 1% of the cost of Nuclear, if it was a problem we could easy mine more difficult places.
Re:Three Mile Island nuclear plant restart in Microsoft AI p...
by mpweiher on Saturday September 21, 2024 @06:58AM
(#41609145)
Or start recycling the "waste". Which still contains >95% of the energy of the original fuel.
Problem is: raw Uranium is too plentiful (=cheap) for recycling to be worth it.
"Problem"