News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Pragmatic Programmer for Machine Learning by rramadass on Tuesday September 17, 2024 @08:59AM (#41567171)
The point is; "it doesn't have to".
Re:The Pragmatic Programmer for Machine Learning by loco5niner on Tuesday September 17, 2024 @01:06PM (#41569940)
Honestly, I only clicked into this thread because I associated the phrase "The Pragmatic Programmer" with the famous book, and if it's not by the same people, I am less interested in their content specifically because of the "borrowed"(stolen?) term.
Re:The Pragmatic Programmer for Machine Learning by rramadass on Tuesday September 17, 2024 @07:47PM (#41574106)
All your assumptions/preconceived notions are only keeping you from good Knowledge.
Re:The Pragmatic Programmer for Machine Learning by loco5niner on Tuesday September 17, 2024 @08:09PM (#41574248)
It's possible, however I've already wasted time with a click based on the book title, and based on that I would prefer not to give the authors any more of my time regardless of missing out.
Re:The Pragmatic Programmer for Machine Learning by rramadass on Tuesday September 17, 2024 @10:50PM (#41575272)
That makes no sense since you are the one losing out. To paraphrase a proverb; "Hate hurts you more than the person you Hate since they are unaware/unaffected by it".
Re:The Pragmatic Programmer for Machine Learning by loco5niner on Wednesday September 18, 2024 @11:22AM (#41580887)
My primary purpose is to use good judgement on choosing where to spend my time. Thus I choose not to read the book, it's not hate, it's judgement. My secondary purpose is to not reward those who use underhanded schemes to get ahead. This may not have been their intention, but it is how I perceive it.
Re:The Pragmatic Programmer for Machine Learning by rramadass on Wednesday September 18, 2024 @01:17PM (#41582696)
Your logic, perception and judgement are all flawed. You merely looked at a familiar phrase in the title and immediately jumped to a conclusion with negative connotations. That's on you. You have no idea about the book, have read no summary/review of it and hence do not have a clue about it and yet are trying to justify your "judgement"?. The book is published by well-known publishers who would have cleared its title to make sure that there are no legal violations (i.e. underhanded schemes) which could get them into trouble. So on that count also your "judgement" fails.

I am advising you to browse/read the book because we (I and a few others in this thread) have browsed/read the book and found it worthwhile (if you are interested in the domain in the first place, of course).

I have seen some silly arguments in my time but you take the cake on "judging a book by its cover" to a whole new absurd level.