Re:Why some of us like "interdiff" code review systems (not ...
by dmurray on Wednesday September 11, 2024 @08:31PM
(#41516539)
There's also `git rebase --onto`, which effectively does the reverse - you tell git you've already rebased the part of this branch that overlapped with the "intermediate" branch, and it just needs to take care of the rest.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why some of us like "interdiff" code review systems (not ...
by Vinnl on Thursday September 12, 2024 @05:24AM
(#41519040)
Oh that sounds exactly what I need to simplify the workflow I described for the multi-PR use case. I'm going to try that out today, I just happen to have a use case for it ready to go :)
Re:Why some of us like "interdiff" code review systems (not ...
by jrochkind1 on Thursday September 12, 2024 @09:06AM
(#41520467)
Wow, I knew of neither of these, thank you!
I'll have to take some time to experiment with both and make sure I understand howt hey work and any pitfalls!
I am definitely in the crowd that thinks git UX is pretty unintuitive and challenging, despite having used it for over a decade!
These sound like great plumbing for a github-style web UI that actually facilitates multi-step sequence PR's though...