Isn't being dismissed because of something like that and being able to prove it is a bit like winning a lottery?
The singular of anecdote is not data. Getting hit by lightning is also unlikely, but it happens to thousands of people every year.
That doesn't mean I'll be flying a kite in a thunderstorm, but it also doesn't mean that you should lock yourself in a bunker the moment the sky turns grey.
Most of the taboo around this is cultural, not retributive.
Firing people at will includes firing them because you got the feeling they may be behaving in any way in any situation perhaps in conflict to any request you made. Odds are someone won't get fired for stealing office supplies and in at will place they may be more often fired for misunderstandings related to a misperception where they don't come clean on something they never did.
That there was no way to sue the company in that example is a demonstration that the employee lacked any right to break any taboo.
As such there are teeth anywhere that is at will for any request whether it is reasonable or not and whether it relates to a taboo the employee may be expected to have or not.
Re:Ask HN: Why Is Pave Legal?
by FactKnower69 on Wednesday September 11, 2024 @07:31PM
(#41516219)
>The singular of anecdote is not data.
No funnier response to a post directly proving you wrong. L
Most of the taboo around it is cultural, because people here attach their self-worth to their paycheck.
You could also always do it anonymously or pseudonymously. You'd have almost no chances of retaliation in that case.