> Sorry, I was actually asking what your critique of their comment was, specifically

I laid it out twice already. Which part is confusing?

> someone else followed up saying they don't feel it's an issue

Someone else followed up with a hilariously nonsensical excuse for why a hard, OBJECTIVE deficiency is not a problem and actually an advantage. If you don't understand what the problem with that is, I can't help you.

> with little critical thinking applied

Oh, you're good at critical thinking?