Re:Apple iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max
by yunwal on Monday September 09, 2024 @05:41PM
(#41494287)
The parent comment is saying once an optional feature gains enough traction, Apple will make it mandatory.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max
by shuckles on Monday September 09, 2024 @05:55PM
(#41494470)
Apple very reasonably has decided using your phone while driving requires voice support. It's not about "traction."
Re:Apple iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max
by yunwal on Monday September 09, 2024 @07:09PM
(#41495270)
People have used buttons in their cars for years. I’d be curious to know whether Siri is actually safer.
Re:Apple iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max
by shuckles on Monday September 09, 2024 @07:24PM
(#41495394)
People have not been responding to text messages or browsing their entire music library in their cars for years. Siri also doesn't have to be safer than buttons, it just has to be safer than touching your phone for it to make sense as a UX requirement.
Re:Apple iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max
by niteshade on Monday September 09, 2024 @07:25PM
(#41495405)
I don't believe people have used buttons in their cars specifically to control their phones, though.
I do agree that it would be nice to know whether voice control is safer, but unfortunately I can't find any studies that compare voice vs tactile control (all I can find is studies on touch vs tactile)
Re:Apple iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max
by mewpmewp2 on Tuesday September 10, 2024 @10:13AM
(#41500996)
If the voice control was reliable it would absolutely be safer, it's like telling your passenger to change the AC, except they don't have to move and bother you.
If the voice control is bad and you are never sure if it heard it correctly then it wouldn't be safer.