News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reclaim the Stack by filleokus on Monday September 09, 2024 @05:16AM (#41486731)
As with everything it's not black or white, but rather a spectrum. Sure, updating k8s is not that bad, but operating a distributed storage solution is no joke. Or really anything that requires persistence and clustering (like elastic).

You can also trade operational complexity for cash via support contracts and/or enterprise solutions (like just throwing money at Hitachi for storage rather than trying to keep Ceph alive).

Re:Reclaim the Stack by p_l on Monday September 09, 2024 @05:26AM (#41486778)
If you don't need something crazy you can just grab what a lot of enterprises already had done for years, which is drop a few big storage servers and call it a day, connecting over iSCSI/NFS/whatever
Re:Reclaim the Stack by filleokus on Monday September 09, 2024 @07:11AM (#41487354)
If you are in Kubernetes land you probably want object storage and some kind of PVC provider. Not thaaat different from an old fashioned iSCSI/NFS setup to be honest, but in my experience different enough to cause friction in an enterprise setting. You really don't want a ticket-driven, manual, provisioning process of shares
Re:Reclaim the Stack by p_l on Monday September 09, 2024 @08:02AM (#41487733)
a PVC provider is nice, sure, but depending on how much you need/want simplest cases can be "mount a subdirectory from common exported volume", and for many applications ticket-based provisioning will be enough.

That said on my todo-list is some tooling to make simple cases with linux NFS or SMI-capable servers work as PVC providers.