Re:The "email is authentication" pattern
by antifa on Sunday September 08, 2024 @02:49PM
(#41482255)
How many forms of backup survive "the government threw you in prison for years?" Even Gmail will refuse to authenticate a correct password with "we couldn't verify it was you" if you never binded your account to a phone and just got out of prison 3 years later.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The "email is authentication" pattern
by drdaeman on Sunday September 08, 2024 @03:06PM
(#41482369)
Uh, well, in context of crypto - your (self-owned) crypto wallet totally would work.
As for email... Sure, I guess it depends on the service and their policies. But here's an anecdote. A few years ago, I've managed to log in in to a completely forgotten 10+ years old email account, finding its password in an old backup. It worked. ¯\(ツ)/¯
If an user cannot log in with a valid credentials, without brute-forcing them, after some years of absence, it's absolutely the service's fault. Of course, in the modern world, customer issues mean nothing so anything goes. But -quoting GP post - when designing a "fantasy football" alternate authentication system for the Internet, this probably shouldn't be a thing.