Re:An open discussion forum for ArXiv papers
by michaelmior on Sunday September 08, 2024 @12:57PM
(#41481480)
Given that the paper would have be changed regardless, including the full email address is a relatively easy solution. ORCID is probably easier than requiring public keys and a lot of journals already require them.
Re:An open discussion forum for ArXiv papers
by westurner on Sunday September 08, 2024 @06:30PM
(#41483785)
W3D Decentralized Identifiers are designed for this use case.
Re:An open discussion forum for ArXiv papers
by westurner on Monday September 09, 2024 @08:23PM
(#41495849)
Decentralized identifier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralized_identifier
W3C TR did-core: "DID Decentralized Identifiers 1.0": https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/
W3C TR did-use-cases: "Use Cases and Requirements for Decentralized Identifiers" https://www.w3.org/TR/did-use-cases/
"Email addresses are not good 'permanent' identifiers for accounts" (2024) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38823817#38831952
Re:An open discussion forum for ArXiv papers
by michaelmior on Tuesday September 10, 2024 @07:20AM
(#41499623)
I'm sure that would work, but most researchers already have an ORCID are required to provide it other places anyway.
Re:An open discussion forum for ArXiv papers
by westurner on Tuesday September 10, 2024 @07:53PM
(#41506845)
In comparison to DIDs, ORCIDs aren't sk/pk pairs that can be used to cryptographically sign.
A person can generate (and optionally register) additional DIDs if they please.
A person can request additional ORCIDs if they please
Re:An open discussion forum for ArXiv papers
by lucioperca on Monday September 09, 2024 @09:59AM
(#41488660)
Probably it would be better to merge the project with Arxiv and tie it to the accounts there.
While the grandparent is understandably disappointed with the current implementation, relying on emails was always doomed from the start.