Re:Exercise has 2M users but no money in the bank
by dmurray on Friday September 06, 2024 @04:18PM
(#41469412)
How does it not "poison the mission" if it means 99% of users drop the platform?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Exercise has 2M users but no money in the bank
by insane_dreamer on Friday September 06, 2024 @05:33PM
(#41469883)
Fair point. I used 1% at the very low end -- if the amount is small enough (in the $1/month range) I think the opt-in rate would be much higher.
I would then give a free account to anyone who asks. ("We know that even $1/month is a big ask for some folks in certain countries or they may even have a method by which to pay it. If that's you, let us know and apply for a free account here.") Then basically auto-approve (with some bot-screening mechanism) accounts that apply. Sure you'll get some abuse and people lying, but not that many people are going to lie just to save $1/month.
Re:Exercise has 2M users but no money in the bank
by MrDresden on Friday September 06, 2024 @05:09PM
(#41469749)
Does that even matter if the mission is dead?
Re:Exercise has 2M users but no money in the bank
by Barrin92 on Friday September 06, 2024 @05:14PM
(#41469778)
that's one percent more success at the mission than you have if you're forced to turn the servers off because you can't pay the bills. Money's to an organization what's oxygen is to a body, before you go and plan any missions you need to be able to sustain yourself.
Re:Exercise has 2M users but no money in the bank
by jessriedel on Friday September 06, 2024 @08:33PM
(#41470712)
Another alternative is charging $10/month, but allowing students or anyone to request a waiving of fees. They just need to take a minimal speed-bump action to request it, e.g., sending an email once per year. Anyone who isn't willing to do this probably isn't getting much value anyway, and a non-trivial fraction of people (more than 1%) would plausibly pay $10/year just to avoid the speed bump or to support the mission.