Re:Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
by prosunpraiser on Friday September 06, 2024 @04:41AM
(#41464194)
You prove the point that these are just token generation machines whose output is psuedo-intelligent. It’s probably not there yet to be blindly trusted.
Re:Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
by fennecfoxy on Friday September 06, 2024 @09:30AM
(#41466029)
More to the point; I wouldn't blindly trust 99% of humans, let alone a machine.
Though to be fair we will hopefully quickly approach a point where a machine can be much more trusted than a human being, which will be fun. Don't cry about it, it's our collectives faults for proving that meat bags can develop ulterior motives.
Re:Phind-405B and faster, high quality AI answers for everyone
by renewiltord on Friday September 06, 2024 @05:08AM
(#41464361)
One of the oldest tricks to make LLMs perform better is to ask them to "think step by step". I asked your question to Claude with that one
```
const MyClass& getMyClass(){....}
auto obj = getMyClass();
```
Does this make a copy. Let's think step by step.
This might help you if you're trying to get these to help you more often.
Here is the godbolt output https://godbolt.org/z/Mz8x74vxe . You can see the "copy" being printed. And you can also see you can call non-const methods on copied object, which implies it is a non-const type
I asked the very same question to phind and it gave the same answer https://www.phind.com/search?cache=k3l4g010kuichh9rp4dl9ikb
How come two different AIs, one was supposed to be specialized on coding, fails in such a confident way?