News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI-powered music scam nets musician $10M in royalties–and... by johnnyanmac on Thursday September 05, 2024 @01:04PM (#41458524)
>he should definitely be penalized somehow until that money, plus damages, is redirected to actual artists.

You know it won't go to the artists. Spotify takes it and at best some publishers (or what name they choose in music) get a little cut on the top to keep in good graces.

This is definitely wrong but this is exactly why I don't really have any sympathy here.

On top of the fact that Spotify probably also did and does the exact same scheme, but that was in a period of "market capture mode" and the adverts didn't care enough to not be frauded. Instead playing the long game. (Blitzar in another response explained this better than I did).

Re:AI-powered music scam nets musician $10M in royalties–and... by spondylosaurus on Thursday September 05, 2024 @01:22PM (#41458670)
Publishers don't just get a little cut... they get a LOT of cut.

I've long maintained that the "Spotify fucks over musicians" angle is cleverly positioned to hide the "record labels fuck over musicians the same as they always have for 50+ years" angle. Because the big record labels are still doing great in the streaming era!

Re:AI-powered music scam nets musician $10M in royalties–and... by johnnyanmac on Thursday September 05, 2024 @03:14PM (#41459608)
I agree. I suppose I haven't seen exactly how much Spotify keeps on top for a while, but I wouldn't be surprised if Spotify itself is beholden to the publishers. Definitely a tug of war.

Same shit, different day either way.