News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux. Parent comment

Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by packetlost on Thursday September 05, 2024 @10:13AM (#41456826)
This... is just not true. I use journald extensively on a 600Mhz Cortex-A9 daily and it's not slow. I don't know what kind of log load you have, but even when I have processes crashlooping and am sending logs over SSH over a VPN it's fine.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by LtWorf on Thursday September 05, 2024 @02:17PM (#41459142)
He's talking about reading logs not writing them.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by packetlost on Thursday September 05, 2024 @04:15PM (#41460059)
So am I?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by Brian_K_White on Thursday September 05, 2024 @08:30PM (#41461686)
Hey everyone, it worked on his machine so it's actually not a problem and anyone who has a problem is lying or stupid. Glad that's cleared up.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by packetlost on Thursday September 05, 2024 @10:15PM (#41462254)
That's not even remotely what I said.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by awilfox on Thursday September 05, 2024 @10:16PM (#41462265)
The systemd journald test is the longest one on my 3 GHz Power9 system, nearly timing out:

    1475/1475 systemd:libsystemd / test-journal-verify                                    OK              28.44s
but on x86 it runs in under 1s. Not sure the deal there.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by packetlost on Thursday September 05, 2024 @10:22PM (#41462308)
I'm not familiar enough with the POWER ISA or POWER9 systems to have any idea what's going on there, but that is surprising.
[ Parent | on HN ]