News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Building high-level features using large scale unsupervis... by Cyranix on Friday June 22, 2012 @02:01AM (#4145642)
"Singularity is near"? "Holy grail"? You may be getting a little carried away here.

The outcome shows a very nice improvement on an unsupervised classification and feature detection task, but it also highlights that unsupervised machine learning still has a long way to go. 16% accuracy from a network with 1bn connections and 100m inputs using (if my math is right) 1.15m hours of CPU time. Which of these would be the easiest way to continue making gains: investing more time/hardware, increasing the complexity of the model, or developing a new and improved algorithm altogether? All of these sound pretty intensive to me.

Re:Building high-level features using large scale unsupervis... by marshallp on Friday June 22, 2012 @02:07AM (#4145659)
If the algorithm keeps increasing in accuracy as you scale up computation and add more unlabeled data that is pretty amazing. You might get something that matches human performance on vision/speech recognition etc.
Re:Building high-level features using large scale unsupervis... by jules on Friday June 22, 2012 @08:10AM (#4146410)
If you extrapolate that way you'd conclude that naive Bayes is the solution to AI. Improvements tend to tail off fairly quickly as you add more data and computation, unfortunately.