Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux

Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by candiddevmike on Thursday September 05, 2024 @09:15AM (#41456336)

Only issue I have with networkd is lack of adoption: network manager is pushed hard (Red Hat still clinging to nm for servers, ew) or want to add another abstraction around it (Canonical with netplan). It's an awesome, declarative way to manage networking, embrace it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by abcrawf on Thursday September 05, 2024 @11:48AM (#41457715)

Man, we fought hard at Red Hat to get them to continue using networkd with their latest container-focused OS. Ultimately, the organization just had too much institutional momentum behind NM. Frankly, I’m disappointed that they lacked the imagination and drive to push the industry forward.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by 3np on Thursday September 05, 2024 @03:45PM (#41459845)

Good on you. I hope they come around. IMO NM has no business on servers and systemd-networkd is relatively robust by now.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by mastax on Thursday September 05, 2024 @09:25AM (#41456424)

Yeah I really like networkd as well, switched my Debian servers to it. Netplan also seems fine.

[ Parent | on HN ]