Re:Internet Archive loses appeal over eBook lending
by tptacek on Wednesday September 04, 2024 @07:19PM
(#41451861)
People keep saying this, but it's unclear that there will be significant damages assessed in this case. 17 USC 504(c)(2) suggests damages will be waived as IA is recognized as a nonprofit and its copying was noncommercial. Likely the real damage here will be to legal precedent.
Re:Internet Archive loses appeal over eBook lending
by Spooky23 on Thursday September 05, 2024 @01:41PM
(#41458862)
Fair, and I hope you’re right.
Re:Internet Archive loses appeal over eBook lending
by gojomo on Thursday September 05, 2024 @03:04PM
(#41459545)
This histrionic concern trolling about "mortally…damaged" is nutty, given that IA already settled the damages portion with the plaintiffs over a year ago for what seems to be some symbolic amount: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40203774
Perhaps diligent but conservative government archives should be run by your gray ideal of "boards of archivists and librarians".
But the Internet Archive was founded to be an activist organization, in deed and legal strategy. When you start, fund, or staff an archive, you can run it as risk-averse as you'd like.
The the name of this nonsense, the Internet Archive damaged itself, perhaps mortally and damaged the concepts it stands for. Archives should be run by boards of archivists and librarians, not reckless activists.