Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by quantadev on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @05:06AM
(#41432853)
Every sentence of that was pure strawmanning, so this is where we stop talking; but you were a good sounding board for a few back and forths up until here.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by godelski on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @06:31AM
(#41433369)
Asking you to step up your game is not strawmanning. But if you're unwilling to then I guess the other comments should have made it clear this would happen
Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by HeatrayEnjoyer on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @08:34AM
(#41434341)
There was no strawmanning
Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by quantadev on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @11:45AM
(#41436078)
Strawmanning is when someone intentionally invents an incorrect interpretation of someone else's words, and then disproves or shows the faults with that wrong interpretation. That's precisely what we saw above.
Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by quantadev on Wednesday September 04, 2024 @02:50PM
(#41449159)
Asking clarifying questions is the exact opposite of Strawmanning. Rather than assuming someone is wrong, it's better to ask for a clarifications first. That's what's happening in #41440133.