News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Alexander Grothendieck: a forgotten genius– or a lonely m... by bubblyworld on Monday September 02, 2024 @01:32AM (#41422859)
Ah, I see, so they've basically found a nice way to express the easy stuff (finding the constraints) but the devil's in the optimisation, of course.

Thanks for taking the time to reply. Coincidentally, I'm doing a project with Arnold's book on CM at the moment, so that all makes perfect sense to me.

Re:Alexander Grothendieck: a forgotten genius– or a lonely m... by catgary on Monday September 02, 2024 @01:44AM (#41422910)
Right, basically the generalization goes: Lie groups -> Lie group actions -> Lie groupoids. This is not a new observation (in fact Arnold’s fluid mechanics can be rephrased using lie groupoids https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/91859/1/Fu..., and big names like Alan Weinstein have worked in that area). I don’t think the authors actually understand that story, so they very naively went groups -> group actions -> monads. If it went that way someone in mathematical physics or optimization would have stumbled onto other concrete examples. But they haven’t, because it doesn’t.