Re:Elasticsearch is open source, again
by anticorporate on Thursday August 29, 2024 @04:47PM
(#41395102)
What could be learned from this example that might enable companies in the future to leverage trademark instead of a license change to accomplish the same thing? So much damage could have been avoided if this had been resolved differently to begin with.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Change your name, not your license.
Re:Elasticsearch is open source, again
by flockonus on Thursday August 29, 2024 @05:43PM
(#41395584)
I think they are saying: trademark your product name (open source in this case), make sure it's used only as approved.
Altho i believe it does go back to the license attached to the product.
Re:Elasticsearch is open source, again
by ignaloidas on Friday August 30, 2024 @02:32AM
(#41398207)
Source code license doesn't matter, Mozilla did this with Debian, that's why Iceweasel was a thing.