Re:Judges Rule Big Tech's Free Ride on Section 230 Is Over
by Manuel_D on Thursday August 29, 2024 @04:21PM
(#41394890)
> For example, if someone else with the exact same selections gets the same results, then that's not their platform deciding what to show.
This could very well be true for TikTok. Of course "selection" would include liked videos, how long you spend watching each video, and how many videos you have posted
And on the flip side a button that brings you to a random video would supply different content to users regardless of "selections".
Re:Judges Rule Big Tech's Free Ride on Section 230 Is Over
by djhn on Thursday August 29, 2024 @04:13PM
(#41394831)
It could be difficult to draw the line. I assume TikTok’s suggestions are deterministic enough that an identical user would see the same things - it’s just incredibly unlikely to be identical at the level of granularity that TikTok is able to measure due to the type of content and types of interactions the platform has.
Re:Judges Rule Big Tech's Free Ride on Section 230 Is Over
by basch on Saturday August 31, 2024 @08:12PM
(#41413037)
And time.
An account otherwise identical made two days later is going to interact with a different stream. Technically deterministic but in practice no two end up ever being exactly alike, (despite similar people having similar channels.)
The "answer" will turn back into tv channels. Have communities curate playlists of videos, and then anyone can go watch the playlist at any time. Reinvent broadcast tv / the subreddit.
If it does any customization based on what it knows about you, or what it tries to sell you because you are you, then it would be liable.
Yep., recommendation engines would have to be very carefully tuned, or you risk becoming liable. Recommending only curated content would be a way to protect yourself, but that costs money that companies don't have to pay today. It would be doable.