Re:Judges Rule Big Tech's Free Ride on Section 230 Is Over
by jay_kyburz on Thursday August 29, 2024 @04:23PM
(#41394904)
Are you asking about the law, or are you asking our opinion?
Do you think its reasonable for social media to send videos to people without considering how harmful they are?
Do you even think its reasonable for search engine to respond to a specific request for this information?
Re:Judges Rule Big Tech's Free Ride on Section 230 Is Over
by autoexec on Thursday August 29, 2024 @06:11PM
(#41395816)
Personally, I wouldn't want search engines censoring results for things explicitly searched for, but I'd still expect that social media should be responsible for harmful content they push onto users who never asked for it in the first place. Push vs Pull is an important distinction that should be considered.
Re:Judges Rule Big Tech's Free Ride on Section 230 Is Over
by MadnessASAP on Thursday August 29, 2024 @08:24PM
(#41396682)
That IS the distinction at play here.
Re:Judges Rule Big Tech's Free Ride on Section 230 Is Over
by oceanplexian on Thursday August 29, 2024 @05:14PM
(#41395364)
Did some hands come out of the screen, pull a rope out then choke someone? Platforms shouldn’t be held responsible when 1 out of a million users wins a Darwin award.
Does TikTok have preempt this category of videos in the future or simply respond promptly when notified such a video is posted to their system?