News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Update on Llama adoption by jstummbillig on Thursday August 29, 2024 @12:01PM (#41392208)
To me it's fairly interesting how relatively little money it takes meta to pose a risk to other models makers businesses, who are dependent on having to run the model after they created it (because that is how they make money) while meta does not even have to deal with the cost attached to providing inference infra, at all, to do that.
Re:Update on Llama adoption by phyrex on Thursday August 29, 2024 @01:44PM (#41393390)
That's a funny definition of "little money"
Re:Update on Llama adoption by cosmojg on Thursday August 29, 2024 @05:17PM (#41395396)
They did say "relatively little money" which is arguably true.
Re:Update on Llama adoption by phyrex on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @08:03AM (#41434095)
How do? It’s little money neither relative to metas income nor relative to anyone else?