News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Knockknock: Simple, secure, and stealthy port knocking im... by sevg on Wednesday August 28, 2024 @01:26AM (#41376239)
> I'm trying to understand

Well on the one hand you make it seem like you're here for genuine adult conversation.

On the other hand you call people that disagree with you the "NSA".

And that is the point this conservation has outlived its usefulness :)

Re:Knockknock: Simple, secure, and stealthy port knocking im... by Demiurge on Wednesday August 28, 2024 @04:20AM (#41377247)
Yeah, it might read like that, but it also is how I feel. If I was running a crypto farm, or if I was doing security research, I would have different levels of concerns.

But, in fact, hosting a competitive gsmijg website, I did experience common brute force and and other types of attacks, but fail2ban did foil them for years :)

None of the attackers were ever sophisticated enough to come up with a successful attack (that I know of :))

The point is, should everything be do all the best practices as if they were equally likely to be attacked?

It’s like saying that everyone should also have a faraday cage house, and electrified fences, it is the best practice, after all.

Re:Knockknock: Simple, secure, and stealthy port knocking im... by Bluestein on Wednesday August 28, 2024 @09:40AM (#41379417)
For the record, and whatever worth - it is the (it seems, serious) conviction of here folks (and I concur) that the NSA is at least a reader of these threads.-

PS. So, hi!

Re:Knockknock: Simple, secure, and stealthy port knocking im... by Bluestein on Thursday August 29, 2024 @02:28PM (#41393872)
PS. I'll take the negvotes as confirmation I guess ...