News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Faster CRDTs (2021).

Re:Faster CRDTs (2021) by IshKebab on Tuesday August 27, 2024 @05:30PM (#41373303)
(2021) and Automerge's Rust implementation seems to have landed so it would be interesting to see an updated benchmark.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Faster CRDTs (2021) by josephg on Tuesday August 27, 2024 @06:53PM (#41374140)
Author here. Yjs has also been rewritten in rust (yrs) and it’s significantly faster than the JavaScript version.

I’ve also got a new, totally different approach to solving this problem too.

It would definitely be good to update the benchmarks. Everything has gotten faster.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Faster CRDTs (2021) by demircancelebi on Tuesday August 27, 2024 @07:43PM (#41374487)
would love to read the totally different approach
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Faster CRDTs (2021) by og2023 on Tuesday August 27, 2024 @08:18PM (#41374733)
Absolutely support this, so do I!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Faster CRDTs (2021) by britannio on Sunday September 08, 2024 @08:19PM (#41484402)
But in the eg-walker paper, you benchmark against Yjs rather than Yrs because Yrs performed worse?
[ Parent | on HN ]