News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ArcticDB: Why a Hedge Fund Built Its Own Database by jjmunro on Sunday August 25, 2024 @05:39AM (#41345936)
100% makes sense, it depends what you're looking for.

There are however lots of time-series that do change in Finance, e.g. valuations, estimates, alt-data (an obvious one is weather predictions). The time-travel feature can being super useful outside of external data changing as well, as an audit-log, and as a way to see how your all-time evaluations have changed (say backtests).

Re:ArcticDB: Why a Hedge Fund Built Its Own Database by nzjrs on Sunday August 25, 2024 @07:50AM (#41346612)
Id be interested to hear how often you have your team use this to also store historical backtest results as people iterate on strategies.
Re:ArcticDB: Why a Hedge Fund Built Its Own Database by dnadler on Sunday August 25, 2024 @08:46AM (#41346921)
I’ve never seen it used for backtests personally. Generally backtested results are saved as a batch of variants following some naming convention as different symbols.
Re:ArcticDB: Why a Hedge Fund Built Its Own Database by jjmunro on Monday August 26, 2024 @05:12AM (#41355318)
So, yes, separating the use-cases out...

You would use some convention for naming and parametrising backtests, 'different' backtests would get stored separately. But once you start updating backtests, running them in a loop with changing data, that's when the time-travel feature starts to be useful.

Re:ArcticDB: Why a Hedge Fund Built Its Own Database by dnadler on Monday August 26, 2024 @12:26PM (#41358839)
Yeah, that’s fair, and something you basically get for free.

Also, hi James! :)

Re:ArcticDB: Why a Hedge Fund Built Its Own Database by jjmunro on Monday August 26, 2024 @05:08AM (#41355284)
It's a primary use-case.