Nvidia PR Responds To Torvalds' Harsh Words

Re:Nvidia PR Responds To Torvalds' Harsh Words by JoshTriplett on Tuesday June 19, 2012 @03:32PM (#4133671)

If you mean the ATI proprietary drivers, I can believe that nVidia's suck slightly less. However, the majority of Radeon cards have full 2D/3D support in Open Source drivers (and those drivers actually have developers from ATI working on them), whereas the reverse-engineered nouveau driver supports a smaller subset of nVidia cards with much lower 3D support (and no support from nVidia whatsoever).

So, I'd still take ATI over nVidia due to ATI's much better Open Source drivers with some development done by ATI, though I'd take Intel over ATI for having entirely Open Source drivers with much more direct development from Intel.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nvidia PR Responds To Torvalds' Harsh Words by cfn on Tuesday June 19, 2012 @03:53PM (#4133793)

I guess different people had different experiences. My nVidia cards have worked just fine on Linux but my HD7750 ATI card does not work properly (random screen flashes and poor rendering) on Ubuntu no matter which driver I try.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nvidia PR Responds To Torvalds' Harsh Words by JshWright on Tuesday June 19, 2012 @07:25PM (#4134766)

> the majority of Radeon cards have full 2D/3D support in Open Source drivers (and those drivers actually have developers from ATI working on them)

And yet, the performance is still an order of magnitude worse than the proprietary driver (last time I bothered to compare them, anyway).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nvidia PR Responds To Torvalds' Harsh Words by Symmetry on Tuesday June 19, 2012 @08:04PM (#4134917)

These days its more a factor of 2 than an order of magnitude. At least for 3D processing, the open source driver is actually faster on 2D.

[ Parent | on HN ]