Re:The guidance system and computer of the Minuteman III nuc...
by kragen on Tuesday August 20, 2024 @12:09PM
(#41301303)
yes! but also keep in mind that 1/s is never 0 for any finite s, so even at high frequencies the error resulting from random noise is never zero, it's just strongly attenuated
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The guidance system and computer of the Minuteman III nuc...
by KK7NIL on Tuesday August 20, 2024 @12:45PM
(#41301629)
That's right but "the Bode plot of an integrator is a line with a -20 dB/decade slope" doesn't really roll off the tongue ;)
Re:The guidance system and computer of the Minuteman III nuc...
by kragen on Tuesday August 20, 2024 @01:08PM
(#41301824)
it's implicit in this comment by kens though:
> if you buy a commercial-grade gyroscope for [us]$10, it will have a random walk error of several º/√h. So after summing the errors for an hour, you're left with several degrees of random error, which is bad. If you spend [us]$100,000 on a navigation-grade gyroscope, you'll get a random walk error < 0.002º/√h, which is much better.
if the slope was anything else, the unit of °/√h wouldn't make sense; it would have to be °/h or °/∛h or something. similarly for noise figures given in nanovolts/√Hz