However, I am an energy production/consumption maximalist.
I think energy maximalists are malicious, because they consume energy at the expense of our planet. Bitcoin is not a good thing for humanity.
I'm not a big fan of the current power grid too, I think nuclear is the way to go.
Yes
> Hence your problem is not with Bitcoin, but with energy consumption or with our current power production grid.
I also have an additional problem with Bitcoin because it locks us in to using high amounts of energy. If it becomes a main currency then it's just one more think to lock us into using huge amounts of energy which in turn make it more likely to develop other harmful technologies.
> I'm not a big fan of the current power grid too, I think nuclear is the way to go.
No matter how clean energy is, it promotes further use of other resource in an unsustainable way.
But people will throw more energy at it in the future. There is no reason to put all unused energy into Bitcoin mining.
Energy usage correlates tightly with level of civilization a population has.
Perhaps you mean that it wastes energy? Anything can be seen as a waste energy if you don't understand the benefit of it.
Do you see gold mining as a waste of energy? It uses more energy than bitcoin. Go tell the gold miners they've been wasting their efforts for millennia.
Even though it contaminates the atmosphere by using insane amounts of energy to generate?