News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zero-click Windows TCP/IP RCE impacts all systems with IP... by patrakov on Friday August 16, 2024 @01:23PM (#41268385)
> If I want to run a service though, then I just add a rule to allow traffic on that port to my computer's stable address.

Problem: in most consumer firewalls, and even in OpenWrt, there are simply no words to express this. I don't know what my IPv6 prefix would be next time my modem reconnects, therefore, I don't know which IPv6 address my computer would then get. However, firewall configuration tools are built under the assumption that static IPs are the only existing ones. I just cannot write "the delegated prefix from the WAN plus :d63d:7eff:fed9:0a39".

Re:Zero-click Windows TCP/IP RCE impacts all systems with IP... by ndriscoll on Friday August 16, 2024 @01:27PM (#41268415)
I agree that is an obvious missing functionality. It's never affected me because anywhere I've lived I've always ended up with stable prefixes/addresses (both ipv4 and v6) for years, but it's obviously something consumer firewalls need. Fortunately that's a much easier problem to fix (replace or update the one device) than trying to get everyone to use ipv6 in the first place.
Re:Zero-click Windows TCP/IP RCE impacts all systems with IP... by tcfhgj on Friday August 16, 2024 @08:45PM (#41271564)
The most widespread consumer routers in Germany handle this without any issues.
Re:Zero-click Windows TCP/IP RCE impacts all systems with IP... by patrakov on Saturday August 17, 2024 @02:15AM (#41272408)
Can you share a screenshot of the relevant firewall rule that allows access to one port on one IPv6 address behind the router and doesn't break when the ISP assigns a different delegated prefix?
Re:Zero-click Windows TCP/IP RCE impacts all systems with IP... by tcfhgj on Thursday August 22, 2024 @04:43AM (#41318078)
a bit late:

https://ibb.co/XFtZg8T

Have been using this for years

Re:Zero-click Windows TCP/IP RCE impacts all systems with IP... by patrakov on Friday August 23, 2024 @10:53AM (#41329532)
Better late than never. Thanks! And indeed, this looks like a well-thought-out (with an explicit field for the IPv6 interface ID, as opposed to the full address) approach to IPv6 forwarding and firewalling.