Google Pixel 9 Pro

Re:Google Pixel 9 Pro by eddieroger on Tuesday August 13, 2024 @02:54PM (#41238386)

There's also only one Bluetooth stack on Apple's platforms (presumably shared), so testing is more straightforward. And if so inclined, there's also the Made for iPhone program that requires validation, but again that's with one device in two form factors. It's not a fair challenge comparing Android device support because the task is bigger, though Google could probably do some stuff to make that less painful.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Pixel 9 Pro by SkyPuncher on Tuesday August 13, 2024 @04:10PM (#41239257)

As a consumer, I just don't care whether it's fair or not. Android and iOS are competing, almost identical platforms. They both do what I need, but only one of them doesn't always break.

Saying it's not fair to compare them is like saying it's not fair to compare a minivan to an SUV when making a car purchase. They're different, but similar enough.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Pixel 9 Pro by londons_explore on Tuesday August 13, 2024 @03:28PM (#41238794)

Google could just say "Here is our official bluetooth hardware/software. Either use the official hardware/software, or use something else but we will kick you out of the android program if your implementation and ours ever have any kind of difference that is noticeable to a user".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Pixel 9 Pro by AtlasBarfed on Tuesday August 13, 2024 @03:27PM (#41238783)

It's almost like there should be a, I don't know, STANDARD test suite that peripherals, phones, and chips that want to use the Bluetooth STANDARD would have to pass in order to advertise being compatible with the Bluetooth STANDARD, as directed and administered by the Bluetooth STANDARD organization.

Bluetooth is so old that it was coming into use when Computer Shopper was still published. It's been a dumpster fire of compatibility since its inception.

There's one of two culprits on the Android side: either its the device drivers, or the OS itself. Device drivers should be capable of being subjected to stringent acceptance standards in order to advertise "Bluetooth". If it's the OS, that's even worse since it is higher up the abstraction stack. At least the device drivers being closer to hardware have an excuse.

Bluetooth is 26 years old. A 26 year old industry standard should be better than a coinflip as to whether some bluetooth thingamajig will work with a mobile OS. It's just sad.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Pixel 9 Pro by Bluestein on Tuesday August 13, 2024 @03:38PM (#41238897)

> year old industry standard should be better

Ballpark as old as USB if not mistaken, and that's saying lots ...

[ Parent | on HN ]