Re:Interstellar movie is implemented with Einstein's equatio...
by hermitcrab on Monday August 12, 2024 @09:35AM
(#41224206)
>It's quite easy, using a jet aircraft, to (via a ballistic trajectory) get into space
A jet engine requires atmosphere. Spaces requires no (or very little) atmosphere.
The edge of space is usually defined at 100km (the Karman line).
The highest altitude reach by an air breathing jet is around 37km. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_altitude_record
A scramjet might get to ~75km according to: https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/44837/what-is-t...
Re:Interstellar movie is implemented with Einstein's equatio...
by wizzwizz4 on Monday August 12, 2024 @10:15AM
(#41224621)
That's the point at which the jet stops working, but by that point you can be going quite fast. If there isn't enough air to run the jet engine, there also isn't enough air to slow you down (much).
Re:Interstellar movie is implemented with Einstein's equatio...
by hermitcrab on Monday August 12, 2024 @12:15PM
(#41226150)
Assuming no air resistance and 10m/s^2 gravity. I calculate that you would have to be doing ~1,100m/s (~mach 3.2 at sea level) straight up at 37km to reach 100km. Or ~1,600m/s (~mach 4.7 at sea level) at 45 degrees to perpendicular.
Re:Interstellar movie is implemented with Einstein's equatio...
by wizzwizz4 on Monday August 12, 2024 @05:41PM
(#41229642)
Seems about right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_HARP (1966) got 2100m/s from a ground-based cannon: this got the projectile to 179km.
Heck, you could even ignore the jet aspect, and go for full rocket. (An ICBM only weighs around 50 tonnes, after all.) Getting the heavy thing into orbit, though, requires proper, multi-stage rockets.