News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DEF CON's response to the badge controversy by foundry27 on Saturday August 10, 2024 @07:18PM (#41212935)
It’s concerning to me that this has been downvoted so heavily.

Obviously as a private group DEF CON’s organizers have every right to contract with whatever companies they want to. In the same way, obviously the private individuals paying DEF CON’s organizers have every right to criticize them when they treat their contractors so poorly. However , I think it’s short-sighted and self-defeating to suggest that they shouldn’t ALSO have the right to criticize their choice of companies they work with when it impacts the quality of what they’re paying for.

This is not a sexist, anti-POC, or anti-trans criticism. Deciding on contractors for the reasons they claimed they did would be illegal in the public sector under France’s anti-discrimination laws, under Germany’s Grundgesetz, under Japan’s GPA, under the UK’s Equality Act in many cases, etc.

Re:DEF CON's response to the badge controversy by akira2501 on Saturday August 10, 2024 @08:25PM (#41213166)
There are _much_ better ways to help the causes of Women, People of Color, or People of Different Sexual Orientations then making it a criteria of who you happen to create small one time contracts with.
Re:DEF CON's response to the badge controversy by lnxg33k1 on Saturday August 10, 2024 @11:25PM (#41213798)
>> Obviously as a private group DEF CON’s organizers have every right to contract with whatever companies they want to.

If I remember correctly there are some laws about discrimination by sexual orientation etc

To explain myself, try to imagine that they said to have been picked because white cis men

Re:DEF CON's response to the badge controversy by the__alchemist on Sunday August 11, 2024 @09:30AM (#41216005)
In the US Federal contract system, these preferences are formalized; has been for decades. It's a heavily-exploited game by those who play by its rules. Basic classes are "Service disabled veteran owned" "minority owned" "women owned" etc. I think "veteran owned" counts a bit too.