News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Official proposal for Type Unions in C#. Parent comment

Re:Official proposal for Type Unions in C# by LtWorf on Friday August 09, 2024 @12:57PM (#41203536)
> You can make a single file executable that does not require any dependencies

Which is not distribution friendly. Thanks for finally understanding you were wrong all along.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Official proposal for Type Unions in C# by neonsunset on Friday August 09, 2024 @01:26PM (#41203761)
> Which is not distribution friendly.

Why is that?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Official proposal for Type Unions in C# by LtWorf on Friday August 09, 2024 @03:53PM (#41204867)
Can such a monstruosity be part of a distribution? No. Then...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Official proposal for Type Unions in C# by neonsunset on Friday August 09, 2024 @04:04PM (#41204952)
What makes it a monstrosity? Why should it be (or not be) a part of distribution?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Official proposal for Type Unions in C# by metaltyphoon on Friday August 09, 2024 @06:45PM (#41205985)
Don’t bother he is just saying things in bad faith.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Official proposal for Type Unions in C# by LtWorf on Saturday August 10, 2024 @01:33AM (#41207548)
I think you replied to the wrong comment.
[ Parent | on HN ]