Re:Nxylon: New super-black material made from wood
by pb060 on Wednesday August 07, 2024 @04:58PM
(#41185431)
I believe it's something called "structural absorption", similar to what happens on birds of paradise feathers [1]
Re:Nxylon: New super-black material made from wood
by jmprspret on Wednesday August 07, 2024 @08:23PM
(#41186896)
I'm way out of my depth here, but I think this comparison to the birds of paradise feathers makes the most sense in terms of me visualising what Nxylon would look like with a thin metallic coating
Re:Nxylon: New super-black material made from wood
by majorchord on Thursday August 08, 2024 @12:05AM
(#41187999)
I wonder if this pattern is considered similar to fractals? Or would that work even better? I recently learned that we have figured out how to produce fractal light from lasers as well which sounds quite interesting and useful.
Maybe the reason radio waves travel poorly through trees is due to the leaves having a fractal-like structure as well? And since light is also just electromagnetic radiation too, it makes sense that this phenomenon could also be used to absorb light itself, if I'm understanding correctly. I wonder if this is how stealth paint on aircraft works?
Re:Nxylon: New super-black material made from wood
by digging on Wednesday August 07, 2024 @05:47PM
(#41185926)
> Adding a thin coating of gold would not necessarily change that structure
My confusion is that I would normally expect a layer of gold not to permit any light to pass through. The underlying structure wouldn't be receiving any light, so there would be no photons to trap. Apparently a layer of gold can be applied thinly enough to transmit appreciable light, though.
Re:Nxylon: New super-black material made from wood
by baruz on Wednesday August 07, 2024 @09:17PM
(#41187175)
Gold foil can be beaten to under 2 micrometers.
Re:Nxylon: New super-black material made from wood
by xelamonster on Wednesday August 07, 2024 @05:58PM
(#41186019)
This part of the article confused me, because what does a black pigment do if not "inherently prevent light from escaping"? That's kind of just the definition of absorb.
^ pure conjecture