Re:Show HN: 1-FPS encrypted screen sharing for introverts
by kccqzy on Wednesday August 07, 2024 @09:56PM
(#41187387)
If you are serious about reducing bandwidth, why would you stick to lossless codecs?
Re:Show HN: 1-FPS encrypted screen sharing for introverts
by gregw2 on Friday August 09, 2024 @07:49AM
(#41200931)
User experience wasn't great.
Font quality with lossy codecs generally looked too lousy back when I tried it at various settings. Screensharing unlike videos is very text centric.
I'd be willing to do the right kind of lossy but jpeg discrete cosines back then wasn't it.
Re:Show HN: 1-FPS encrypted screen sharing for introverts
by kccqzy on Saturday August 10, 2024 @04:40PM
(#41212062)
I use many screen sharing apps and none of them have this issue. They do the lossy compression by reducing the number of colors (gradients become bands) not by JPEG-style discrete cosines.
The second version tried to use the VNC approach developed years ago by AT&T and open sourced. The open source implementation glitched just a bit much for my liking. Various companies white labelled VNC in those days; not sure they fed back all their fixes. But the raw VNC protocol has a lot of good compression ideas specific to the screen sharing domain and documented in papers. People also tunneled VNC over SSH. I jerryrigged an HTTPS tunnel of sorts.
After a while I started to suspect if I wanted to get higher frame rates I should use a more modern screen sharing oriented Microsoft-based/specific codec. But it wasn't my skillet so I never actually went down that route. But I'd recommend researching using others screen-optimized lossless codecs, open or closed, so you don't reinvent the wheel on that side of things if you're serious about reducing bandwidth.