News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on racket/rhombus: "We're now officially in the "integration" phase for Rhombus.". Parent comment

Re:racket/rhombus: "We're now officially in the "integration... by Y_Y on Tuesday August 06, 2024 @03:03AM (#41168459)
I'm not going to file a bug report, that's more time than I'm willing to spend on a project I'm not involved in. I will say I'm using Termux 0.118 and Racket 8.13 on kernel 5.10 and Android 14 and am willing to answer questions.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:racket/rhombus: "We're now officially in the "integration... by soegaard on Tuesday August 06, 2024 @04:18AM (#41168794)
> I'm not going to file a bug report, that's more time than I'm willing to spend on a project I'm not involved in.

In that case, I make it quick - and refrain from any followup questions.

Did you by chance pick the "Minimal Racket" distribution?

If so, your command essentially compiled large parts of Racket and generated the entire set of documentation.

The distribution "Full Racket" is the recommended distribution for most purposes. It comes with everything pre-compiled.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:racket/rhombus: "We're now officially in the "integration... by Y_Y on Tuesday August 06, 2024 @04:52AM (#41168955)
No, but yes.

https://github.com/termux/termux-packages/blob/master/packag...

I just installed the package called `racket` from Termux's upstream, and it seems that they're using racket-minimal for that. Bit of a gotcha, but at least it doesn't seem like there's a bug. Thanks for the tip.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:racket/rhombus: "We're now officially in the "integration... by soegaard on Tuesday August 06, 2024 @07:16AM (#41169703)
Thanks for the response.

I'll contact the Termux people and ask if the choice of `racket-minimal` was intentional.

[ Parent | on HN ]