Re:Ocean Gyre
by blackeyeblitzar on Friday August 02, 2024 @04:25PM
(#41142301)
This is a bit meta but does it need to have a citation? Can’t it be educated speculation that is yet to be explored?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ocean Gyre
by HunterWare on Friday August 02, 2024 @05:10PM
(#41142715)
Ok fair, but in that case isn't it missing the words "I think" prepended to the factual assertion.
As in: I think it's missing the words "I think" from that statement. (Which is educated speculation on the statement that has yet to be rigorously explored)
Re:Ocean Gyre
by the_sleaze_ on Friday August 02, 2024 @06:40PM
(#41143284)
Please believe me when I say I mean 'Citation?' in an excited, please let this not be too good to be true, I haven't heard this great news and deeply desire another (a?) strong contender in the direct carbon capture space - especially aqueous - capture, way.
Re:Ocean Gyre
by jbernsteiniv on Saturday August 03, 2024 @06:42PM
(#41149844)
Conjecture should be backed up with evidence or at least a good hypothetical (possibly several) at the very least.